|
| Word Bank- words i like |
opportunistic
Indemnified
Regulated
correspond
Integral
Intuative
Incessant
Verbosity
Malapropism
Empathetically
Discombobulated
Dog
|
|
Journal entry by Xxbazza2006xX at Jun 02 2008 |
7 Comments
|
|
| Untitled |
Consumer Law: Revision
Barrie Greenan (year 1)
Relevant Statute: 1} The Sale of Goods Act 1979...As amended by
2} The Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 ( Merchantable changed to satisfactory)
3} The Consumer Protection Act 1987
4} The Consumer Credit Act 1974
5} The Trades Description Act 1968
6} The Unsolicited Goods and Services Act 1971...As Amended by
7} The Consumer Protection (Distance selling) Act 2000
8} The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Note: 2002 Regulation allow retailers to offer a repair or replacement, however, the consumer is under no obligation to accept this and may still wish to cancel the contract and demand a full refund if an Implied term has been breached.
Relevant Case law: Denholm Fishing V Anderson (Breach of S.14 SGA as amended......as amended Implied Term Q&F) Page.15
Fletcher V Budgen (Misleading trade description in process of a sale) Page.27
E S Ruben Ltd V Faire Bros & Co Ltd. (Breach of S.15 SGA 1979 Implied Term, Sample) Page.14
Grant V Australian Knitting Mills,1936 (Breach of S.14 SGA 1979.....as amended Implied Term. Q&F) Page.11
Rowland V Divall 1923 (Breach of S.12 SGA 1979 Implied Term, Title) Page.5
SGA Implied Terms: S.12 Breach of an Implied term as to Title.
S.13 Breach of an Implied term as to Description.
S.14 Breach of an Implied term as to Quality and Fitness. Amended by 2.
S.15 Breach of an Implied term as to Sale by Sample.
Quality and Fitness: Fitness
Appearance
Freedom from minor defects
Safety
Durability
Description: A Consumer, in a consumer sale, has the right to reject goods which do not correspond with description. However slight the difference.
| |
|
|
|
| Stats |
Xxbazza2006xX joined Spogg at Dec 26 2006 and has logged in 2279 times since then.
|
|
|
Xxbazza2006xX
(Offline)
Location: United Kingdom 
x 28
x 53
x 45
